This isn't nefarious-there just isn't any way to capture all the elements of the deck tracker without using screen capture, which has its own issues. You can capture the deck list, but you have to actually open a separate window with it through the tracker and capture it seperately-you aren't actually capturing the deck window you see when using the tracker yourself (or any of the other elements) so it creates a disconnect between what you see on your screen and what the viewers see. Arcane Tracker is an automatic deck tracker for Hearthstone from the makers of and Hearthstone Deck Tracker. I found out why myself when I tried streaming for a couple weeks a few months back-when you are streaming with scenes (as opposed to screen capture) which is more secure and allows more customization, it is hard to capture the elements of the tracker since it is an addon. However, only a portion of the tracker is shown in twitch. that you commonly see on the side of the screen. The tracker is what gives streamer's the deck list that shows when cards are drawn, what is left, etc. Though you seem to worship it as a God.It's hearthstone deck tracker, a commonly used tool (and kripp and many other streamers use it openly, its not a secret) though kripp's been using some other competing tracker for a couple weeks. I am also not sure HS tracker is the best source of data to use as I said since I dont know where and how they pull their numbers. To be honest I this point I am not trusting anything numbers wise you say as you have proven you are incapable of doing basic assessments of common situations and fallacies. I will enjoy pointing this out to you later this week when Bliz hopefully announces the nerfs to mage and lock. Therefore the sample size discrepancy is leading to your erroneous interpretation.Īgain I know math is hard for you but once more you are incorrect. Warlocks are less popular because the lynchpin card needed is a newly released legendary and thus not a lot of people have it. The fact that the #3s can be “back loaded” is a type of statistical bias. Not necessarily, because if you let RNG #1 run 50 more times you might have gotten 40 more #3s and thus would have a 50% average in the end. You run RNG #1 50 times and you get the #3 10 out of 50 times (20% since math is hard for you). You run RNG #1 100 times and you get the #3 50 times. Lets say you have 2 RNGs that spit out the #3 50% of the time People don’t really understand statistics that well. Mage has a 49% win rate, Warlock 53%, Paladin 55% and Hunter a ridiculous 59%. Read the mountains of stats proving you wrong there. You have an 8th grade education at best, as the high school I went to would’ve failed me for such ignorance behavior. You ignore evidence, claims others do, post nothing it refute, but claim the opposite. Like almost his entire post history is in that thread, and a good 10 people repeatedly posted evidence refuting his claims, and like you he just kept doubling down on his BS.Įventually he posted Cherry Picked “evidence,” that was then proven to be exactly that, cherry picked to (sortof but not really) support his claim while ignoring the mountains that refuted it. There’s another dude just like you named Deadsy that made similar BS claims. I can certainly talk with our designer about adjusting. Go to the thread titled Robes of protection? Calling BS, just wait for nerfs. We also tried moving it to display on the number of cards in the deck, but it just wasnt clear enough. Your wild claims are not a refute of anything they are just that, your wild claims and personal annecdotal headcannon. Dude, what is with people with less then 50 post apparently unable to post basic High-School level proofs and yet somehow convince themselves they refuted something they didn’t even remotely refute.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |